Peer Review Process

Peer review is an essential part of our editorial process. It helps the editor make editorial decisions and can assist the author in improving the paper through editorial communications.

JURNAL BURHANI: Kajian Penelitian Hukum dan Muamalah, all submitted manuscripts are initially evaluated by our editorial team to ensure they meet the scope and style guidelines of our journal, as well as to check for plagiarism. Manuscripts that pass this initial screening will be sent for double-blind peer review by at least two reviewers who are experts in the field. The editor will send an email to the selected reviewers with the title and content of the manuscript and an invitation to log in to our website to complete the review process. Reviewers are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on specific criteria, including relevance, originality, clarity, and validity of the methodology and results. Reviewers are given a maximum of two weeks to complete the review process.

Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the manuscript or knows that they cannot complete the review process in a timely manner should notify the editor and excuse themselves from the review process. Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be shown to or discussed with others, except as authorized by the editor.

Reviewers are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on the following criteria:

  • Relevance and significance to the field of Islamic economics
  • Originality and contribution to the field
  • Clarity and coherence of the manuscript
  • Validity and appropriateness of the methodology
  • Accuracy and validity of the results

Reviewers are also asked to provide constructive feedback to help the author improve the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and personal criticism of the author is not appropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments and identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Reviewers should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the manuscript.